← Return to Collagen for osteoporosis?

Discussion

Collagen for osteoporosis?

Osteoporosis & Bone Health | Last Active: Feb 25 6:07am | Replies (305)

Comment receiving replies
@teb

Thanks for your reply. I sure hope there is more research coming down the pike to clarify. The term "bioactive" just means having a biological effect. There are other products on the market like Verisol and Natural Factors that also use the phrase "bioactive peptides". A recent post I saw by Dr Mark Hyman stated that most nutrition research is company funded and the results are often skewed in favor of their product by 500-800%. Since Gelita funded the study on it's own product, I think we have to take that into consideration. I take collagen (and sure hope it's helpful with no negative impacts in later years since there is a lack of research!) but I think a healthy skepticism is valuable in evaluating cost, sourcing and claims of the products we buy and consume. Right now, I prefer to take a marine collagen vs. bovine as they are both type 1 with similar effects. Fortibone is likely a good product as well but I have to wonder whether it is really different than other products on the market that justify its higher cost. I've contacted the company and hope for a reply.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Thanks for your reply. I sure hope there is more research coming down the pike to..."

I agree wholeheartedly with you about the funding source of studies and the results consequently requiring more careful scrutiny.

Curious why you prefer the marine collagen v bovine?

I have come to respect McCormick on osteoporosis and would put some faith in his apparent preference for bovine collagen.

If you get a reply, I hope you will post it.

Yes, before embracing any research follow the money. Who paid for the research.