← Return to 90% Chance of Significant Blockage with Calcium Score Greater Than 400

Discussion

90% Chance of Significant Blockage with Calcium Score Greater Than 400

Heart & Blood Health | Last Active: Feb 12 8:16am | Replies (13)
Comment receiving replies
@mikekennedy759

Hi bitsygirl,

Actually I had a decent calcium score from what I understand (128) but had a 99%+ blockage. I might have been an outlier. Have they done a nuclear study or scheduled an angiogram? Do you have any other symptoms? In my opinion, I think it is the only way to be sure.

Hugs and well wishes. Mike

Jump to this post

Replies to "Hi bitsygirl, Actually I had a decent calcium score from what I understand (128) but had..."
bitsygirl | @bitsygirl | Feb 9 4:42pm

I had a score in the 98th percentile for my age and gender and it was very unexpected for my lifestyle and general health. Fast forward 10 months and I know my blockages are “mild” and “minimal”, which means less than 50% if I remember correctly, so I am in as good a position as I guess I could expect given the score. I just think about it more than I probably should and my mind wanders.

I really appreciate your caring reply and well wishes. I gather you are doing well after the blockage was discovered?

VIEW AND REPLY