Tulsa Pro - my initial treatment experience
I want to thank all for support on my recent prostate cancer treatment, Tulsa pro. I am very thankful to my wife and my daughter who helped out lots with support. I am thankful to Mayo for finally finding the extent of the problem with a transperineal biopsy. I am also very thankful to Dr Scionti in Sarasota for being a true expert for the Tulsa procedure. Tulsa leaves everything intact except for the prostate cancer tissue plus some tissue as a safety margin near it. It goes nowhere near sphincters and nerves. I was very glad to not have any extra prostatic cancer, or cancer in seminal vesicles, ducts, nerves etc. I did have PSMA scan showing this. We will just have to see if everything works out in the long run cancer wise.
What I had cancer wise
Originally in 2021 I had a small spot seen in transition zone. It got some 3+3 more toward back where they could reach via trans rectal biopsy (done at a local university), but they could not reach the anterior where most of it was in 2021. My 2023 Mayo done transperineal biopsy had one needle at the anterior transition zone with all Gleason 4, it was not a big spot (0.2 mm caught in needle). Keep in mind in 2021 further to back it had just Gleason 3. I am not going to get caught up in Gleason scores, I know what was sampled in past, and though one needle had 4 in the front/top of anterior it was just a tiny spot in this tumor and most toward posterior was not hit here in 2023. There was also a small 3+4 on one side seen now in 2023. My PSA headed up steadily during the 2.75 years on surveillance. My final prostate size before any treatment was 110 cc, and final PSA around 16.
What worked on biopsy, and what did not.
2021: Trans rectal in 2021 biopsy did not sample well, missed most of what is in anterior transition zone and one of my problem areas. But since then, I have had plenty of time to read on things like Tulsa pro, radiation types, and so on. So was glad to have the time.
2023: Mayo Transperineally done biopsy caught the problems.
Some things I learned about MRI
What I learned is that, for me at least, diffusion weighted MRI shows very clearly what docs need to see to treat. Regular contrast enhanced MRI left my doctors not that sure, sometimes even confused. Diffusion weighted MRI to me was crystal clear where things were and what needed to be treated. Only Dr Scionti seemed geared up for diffusion weighted MRI. That includes other places I asked for initial consult, and Mayo that I went to for a while – all geared up for contrast enhanced MRI only really seemed like.
Who does new kinds of treatments.
Mayo is top notch for advanced cancers that have spread, but I learned they are just starting out with other new treatments like Tulsa Pro. I liked Mayo’s proton as a possibility, but they have filled many slots for it, and sometimes it is hard to get through insurance from what they said to me. They also do everything under protocols, they have to develop those for these new treatments of any kind since everyone looks at Mayo. So in some ways they are behind a bit, having to do everything with a protocol instead of just looking out for what is best for one individual patient. Thus, I found I had to call around if I wanted anything new. Some places are better than others seemed like to me at calling places. The best I heard from was Dr Scionti in Sarasota.
Before Tulsa for me
Because the size of my prostate was large, and one needle had all Gl 4, we did bicalutamide and dutasteride for several months. They want that temperature up during Tulsa at the top so while I still met the Tulsa size limits we shrunk things a bit to be sure.
Travel
I had to travel to Sarasota, about a 22 hour drive for me. Found a nice Airbnb down there not too far away. I drove since date of coming back was uncertain. I wanted his office to take catheter out, others might fly and self remove catheter I understand, but I was unsure about that. It is good I rented an Airbnb for more than two weeks is all I can say.
Tulsa procedure
Obviously asleep, seemed to go well. They took out about 2/3 of the prostate tissue with the Tulsa pro. The before and after MRI done while asleep clearly shows the tumors on diffusion weighted MRI, and post procedure MRI with contrast show those same areas treated well and no longer there. Woke up with the bladder spasms a real lot, oxybutynin seemed to really help but it was hard to wake up with Foley catheter and the spasms. Next day the spasms were gone, but it was tough to sit. For ten days with Foley catheter, I watched old Dr Who, movies, and obviously just sleeping. A restful period is the best help, not having to do much was important for me at least. Foley catheter for ten days was no fun but it wasn’t as hard as I imagined perhaps.
Post catheter
Was a bit tough, I still had some inflammation perhaps worse than some get, plus there is scar tissue for up to 6 months, so it was hard to pee. Alpha blocker was a must just to pee. Another couple weeks brings me to now at this writing and it is a lot easier to pee. But it was a hard travel back. I suggest stay in an Airbnb for some time post procedure plus give plenty of time after catheter is out.
Future
We will see if this all worked on the cancer over next year or two, and on after that. Hoping for no recurrence of course.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Thanks for sharing. This is informative for me, just to hear more about a specific procedure and experience different from my own.
Thank you for the detailed synopsis. On active surveillance and have been investigating Tulsa given there's a center in the Atlanta area. Your overview is the best I've come across from someone that has had the procedure. Invaluable.
In case somebody is wondering what Tulsa Pro is here is a Tulsa overview article
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231661/
Conclusions:
As an alternative to conventional treatments, TULSA is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation in men with primary PCa. There is also evidence that TULSA delivers effective relief of urinary symptoms while treating PCa in a single, low-morbidity procedure. The likelihood of freedom from additional treatment or potency preservation is associated with the planned ablation fraction.
---------
I think in a few years it will get more popular as insurance and more providers kick in.
3 month update
My PSA went from max just over 16 at final biopsy at Mayo to 3.00 now at 3 months out from Tulsa Pro. Hopefully that is fine for what was removed which was somewhere like 2/3 to 3/4 of prostate with a lot of BPH. No ED or incontinence.
I stopped all alpha blocker/Flomax at 2 months and now at 3 months I have better flow than last few years leading up to Tulsa Pro.
Dear bjroc...may I ask about how much out-of-pocket expense was the Tulsa Pro procedure? I am 70, have Gleason 3+3, low decipher score of .12, some BPH symptoms. I am reluctant to take the 5 Alpha-Reductase inhibitors ( Flomax,etc)due to potential negative side-effects. I may be interested in Tulsa Pro if I knew about how much the cost is, as I understand Medicare or Medicare Supplement policies do not pay for this procedure. Also, do you know where they perform this service, and would you recommend a qualified provider or clinic? Many Thanks from another member of the Brotherhood of Prostate Cancer Members! kugrad1975.
As far as I understand next Jan 1 of 2025 it has a Medicare code for coverage, but till then it will just a bit over $30K where I had it (Dr Scionti, Sarasota, FL).
For places see:
https://tulsaprocedure.com/
Obviously some are gearing up, some have done it awhile, some have differing acceptance protocols so call multiple places if you can swing the cost.
As far as Flowmax, I only took it one month then switched to Alfuzosin for a month, which has less problems but is no where as strong. Flowmax is needed after the procedure because you would not be able to pee till swelling and so on goes down. For me that was 2 months, some might be longer, some less. It may depend on how much BPH and how much they ablate. But I don't really like Flowmax for regular use, glad I don't need it anymore and if I did I would use Alfuzosin anyway.
What is diffusion weighted MRI. I have gotten three contrast MRIs using 3T machines and got different results in terms of numbers of lesions (3 or 2)
Its part of all MRI as I understand they just don't use it much for our purposes (prostate), though they use it a real lot in other places in the body. It is basically liquid diffuses though tissue and the MRI can pickup the diffusing action, but cancer tends to not diffuse liquids so they can see on the MRI there is an area of low diffusion and that is a tumor.
At least my main original lesion in 2021 did work on contrast MRI, it got a Pirads 5, then next year or 2022 a Pirads 2, then my final MRI before biopsy in 2023 got no Pirads score. So my lesion seemed to not work with contrast slowly over the years. But it is real obvious on the diffusion weighted images, so that part of MRI was working just fine. Not sure I got any good explanation from Mayo or anywhere else why the contrast wasn't working well slowly for me over a few years, but I am glad some doctors also work with diffusion weighted MRI. It was real important in my case. I have no idea how often that is the case, but I am told diffusion weighted images are one of the main tools used most places MRI are used to look for tumors/cancer like in the brain and so on.
So each time I get an MRI with contrast the results change? This is crazy
It did for me, but I don't think that is common. For some reason contrast seemed less effective for me over time, I doubt that is your case. I guess it is always a possibility, probably a very low probability, so how to communicate that to the radiologist to double check the diffusion weighted images if the Pirads rating done with contrast is falling, that I don't know since we almost never see or hear from them. They should be looking at diffusion weighted images, but most don't seem to bother since contrast seems to do the job.