Mild osteoporosis DEXA scores: what would you do?
I posted this question earlier, which was about mild vs. severe DEXA scores. Replies seemed to veer off pretty quickly, lol, so I'm starting again. My last DEXA in May 2023 was a -2.7 spine, and during a surprisingly quick appointment a new doctor (an endo) said to go with Prolia. Background: I had been on Fosamax for over 4 years based on a -2.5 score. I had an initial slight improvement then it dropped to the -2.7. After reading quite a bit on this forum and elsewhere, I don't think my scores warrant Prolia. In fact, I've decided not to go on any medication until May of this year, when I will pursue another DEXA on a TBS-equipped machine. I will consider it my new baseline. My last two DEXAS were on different machines. What are your thoughts about scores, and when it becomes really necessary to treat with meds? Would anyone else here approach it as I am, by waiting a year for another DEXA with TBS?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.
Connect

Can you explain what you mean by "the relationship between low thyroid and bisphosphonates treatment"? I have thyroid issues and osteoporosis and my endo is recommending Reclast.
I am leary of Prolia even though doctors suggest taking it.
I was told to discontinue post menopause hormone therapy( after hysterectomy) because of maternal family history of heart attacks
I have dealt with food sensitivities for more than 40 years. There are legitimate tests for lactose intolerance and celiac disease, but your best bet on anything else is an elimination diet. Just because you have inflammation does not mean you have to stop eating gluten. I would read what Dr. Andrew Weil has to say. Some of the tests you mention are not credible.
@prettyflower, I just had the exact same experience for the exact same reason. The problem is that my first scan (no TBS) was on a GE Lunar machine and the recent scan was on a Hologic machine. I'm glad I got the TBS, but my understanding is that I can't begin to compare the scores b/c of the different machine types. I don't understand it - aren't the bone density numbers the bone density numbers?? If I'd had the Hologic scan first, I'd feel pretty darn good about the scores.
I called the GE Lunar facility and I can pay out of pocket for another scan to go apples to apples. The out of pocket cost, including the radiologist interpretation, is $386.
I'm curious - would you do? All comments welcome.
@gently I have a "funny not funny" story. I saw Paul Miller, M.D. in CO, an internationally recognized physician specializing in metabolic bone disease. He is widely considered a leading authority on bone biology, prevention and treatment of metabolic bone disorders, including osteoporosis, and has recently retired. He was old school and my first visit with him lasted 90 minutes!
He was there when they were deciding on scores for a legit OP diagnosis. He said some MDs wanted the number to be -2.0 and some wanted the numbe to be -3.0 so they compromised at -2.5 so it's not exactly scientific.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions